Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 16274 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Slightly late with this one, it was May 26th 2008 that Cullen resigned, after losing at home to bottom placed Castleford, our 6th defeat in 7.
Now that a decade has passed, how do we assess the Cullen era now? It spanned nearly 6 years (August 2002 to May 200icon_cool.gif, a time where the club was transformed. We moved to a new stadium, Simon Moran became the majority owner and we moved from scrapping at the basement for signings and selling our best players to making statement signings on a regular basis. The whole ambition of the club changed. We played better rugby in the Cullen era than we had since the 1980s, and had some sensational victories. A good number of the most memorable games at the HJ for me came from this era, even more so than the peak Smith era where we were an excellent side but more clinical and ruthless and lacked some of the emotion of the days of Nat Wood and co.
Overall I think Cullen was exactly what was needed at the time he took over, but he probably stayed a year too long. In his last two and a half seasons we were standing still despite the playing roster being bolstered by more and more top players.
On recruitment, Cullen built the bulk of the team that went on to win Challenge Cups under Smith, but I wouldn't overplay the credit here as he didn't do this by signing unknown gems but by splashing the cash of the new investment on established stars. A lot of Cullen signings seemed like good additions when they signed but didn't deliver up to expectations (Cardiss, Kohe-Love in his second spell, Swann, Parker, Sullivan, Rauhihi, Reardon, Barnett, V Anderson, Johnson) plus some whose value wasn't realised until after Cullen had left (Grix, Harrison, L Anderson, King, M Monaghan). His good signings were Grose (for the first 3 of his 5 seasons), Fa'afili, Gleeson, Leikvoll, Bridge, Morley, Hicks.
On youth development, he showed great faith in Chris Riley who went on to be a very successful try scorer for us, and brought through Kevin Penny although subsequently seemed to prefer Riley over him. He brought Mike Cooper in to the side as well. But some of the other Cullen projects ended up disappointing like Pickersgill and Bracek.
Amongst existing players, Paul Wood became a top SL prop under Cullen, Ben Westwood went from an unconvincing centre/winger to a dominant forward, and Lee Briers matured a lot and went from being frustratingly inconsistent to one of SL's elite halfbacks.
Cullen brought some life back to the terraces. He made us exciting and enjoyable to watch. The passivity we had had before he came soon went, we became a team who used the ball and looked to score points. He also - at first - instilled a greater fighting spirit in the team (which we are also seeing this year with the arrival of Price), although this drifted towards the end of his reign, after Nat Wood left and the team lost some of the earlier identity and became more a transit lounge for players who had left big clubs to do a couple of years at Warrington before moving on again or retiring.
The best days under Cullen were the entire 2003 season - where we left Wilderspool with dignity after a few years of being soft at home and an angry mood in the terraces - and the long winning run through the summer of 2005. That was the first time since the Davies era 12 years earlier where we had known what it was like to win for an extended period, it changed the whole mood and ambition, culminating in the signing of Andrew Johns, and from then on it felt that Warrington were on a journey that would end up with silverware.
The Johns experiment ended early with that shock home defeat to Hull in the playoffs, and we were never the same again under Cullen, despite a few high points in one off games, notably the playoff win away at Leeds in 2006. I wonder whether deep down some of the new signings who had played at bigger clubs didn't really rate or respect him, and he wasn't in control as much as he was in his earlier seasons when the team was largely former youth players who he had known from the U21s, plus overseas players with low egos and great attitudes like Wood, Domic and Burns. I started having doubts after the Challenge Cup defeat to Hull KR in mid 2006, and felt we needed to make a change midway through 2007.
All in all a very interesting and relevant part of our history, would be interesting to see how people regard the Cullen era now.
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3280 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The start of the Cullen era was exactly what we needed at the time, and we are forever in his debt for keeping us as the only club never to have spent time outside the top division.
However, the culture of the club was never addressed and we just became a poor-to-mediocre club that had money rather than teetering on brankruptcy. Cullen was clearly not the answer to the future and although I’ve got the utmost respect for him as a player, local legend and attacking coach, I never felt we would become a big club in his time. I do miss some of those spectacular tries though... shame we let two in for every one we scored.
Oh, and he built a team of great players by the time he left... a team that needed Tony Smith to gel and motivate. That’s why Price and co currently deserve some credit as they’ve assembled this 2018 squad quickly and desperately and managed to get them to perform.
|