As we all know later today this forum is going to be in meltdown in frustration at McNamara for picking the wrong side as we all know England would have been strong enough to beat the Kiwis if only X had been playing instead of the same old faces like Sinfield, Tomkins etc.

So which players that were left out would have made all the difference?

I will start with Ratchford, Myler and Atkins.

Another great thread.

Isn't there a game on today or something...

Pathetic thread, and typical of why this board/forum is becoming stale and pants.

Unless of the course the poster was trying to have a sense of irony about later today of this forum. I doubt it though.

He's already made the best decision dripping chase for widdop

If this thread isn't a p*sstake then it's really sad.

Such a ridiculous thread deserves an answer such as :

Hock
Hardaker
Chase

and of course

Brough

The OP is clearly a p*sstake. What's really sad is that he's making a perfectly valid point about the mentality of a lot of 'contributors' to RL.FANS.

LOCK IT NOW

Any half back who has a kicking game would have improved England today. !

Get your head out of broughs backside you bore.

GEt your head out of being a cheerleader you bore.

WE could have put RL on the map in this country but now we have lost that chance.

Every time a club goes bankrupt now, everytime we complain about a lack of publicity, sponsors, media coverage, crowds remember the fact that all of those problems could have been solved if we had won or even got to the WC final.

Then think about why we did not. Then go and say i wish i was not just sticking your boring head in the sand.

That team today would have beaten Australia in the first game. WHO did not pick that team Eh, EH.EH

what's the answer you bore ?

Must be awful as a Huddersfield fan for you. You having to blame all the ills of the sport on your club captain's weak character.