www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 14,00.html GH wants to see wrestling policed more, Brian Mac wants to win with passing. Wigan fans see lack of wrestling and free flowing rugby as some sort of personal insult for some reason viewtopic.php?f=28&t=480069 Cant say I disagree with GH, it is effective but it really doesnt help the spectacle of the game, but we have been guilty of using these things aswell. And im not sure how we could police it.

www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 14,00.html GH wants to see wrestling policed more, Brian Mac wants to win with passing. Wigan fans see lack of wrestling and free flowing rugby as some sort of personal insult for some reason viewtopic.php?f=28&t=480069 Cant say I disagree with GH, it is effective but it really doesnt help the spectacle of the game, but we have been guilty of using these things aswell. And im not sure how we could police it.

Quote SmokeyTA="SmokeyTA"www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12196_6681014,00.html GH wants to see wrestling policed more, Brian Mac wants to win with passing. Wigan fans see lack of wrestling and free flowing rugby as some sort of personal insult for some reason viewtopic.php?f=28&t=480069 Cant say I disagree with GH, it is effective but it really doesnt help the spectacle of the game, but we have been guilty of using these things aswell. And im not sure how we could police it.'" No the personal insult is your ar$ehole chief exec directly complaining about our tactics and trying to make it sound that Wigan and McGuire directly damaging RL.

Quote SmokeyTA="SmokeyTA"www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12196_6681014,00.html GH wants to see wrestling policed more, Brian Mac wants to win with passing. Wigan fans see lack of wrestling and free flowing rugby as some sort of personal insult for some reason viewtopic.php?f=28&t=480069 Cant say I disagree with GH, it is effective but it really doesnt help the spectacle of the game, but we have been guilty of using these things aswell. And im not sure how we could police it.'" No the personal insult is your ar$ehole chief exec directly complaining about our tactics and trying to make it sound that Wigan and McGuire directly damaging RL.

Where has he referred to Wigan?

You do realise that only the bits in quotation marks are his comments and the rest is journalistic interpretation don't you?

Obviously hit a nerve!

Where does Hetherington mention any club whatsoever?

The best way to police it is to call held the moment the ball carrier's forward progress ceases rather than allow defenders to wrestle the upright player and delay the tackle being completed.

However, that will reduce offloads and the type of entertaining broken field play that results from them.

Perhaps some of our pie-eating chums should take a closer look at the article and find anywhere that GH mentions either Michael Maguire or Nathan Brown or their respective clubs?

Any time you feel like coming back and apologising for not being able to comprehend the written word will be just fine Bill.

I feel sorry for you coach that despite being your most successful coach in over a decade, many of your fans are unable to spell his name correctly

i don't blame wigan or anyone for trying it. The fault is with the refs for allowing it. Wigan did push it to far imo but can you blame them if it proves successful and they get away with it?

If the "CAP" fits?
I really hope you dont get conned out of the wcc like we did last year.

Re-read the article and it shows only 1 @r$ehole who's throwing insults around!

the "hicks from the sticks"in toy town wigan are getting upset again

To be fair to GH hes right!
Salford, Catalans, Quins and Wakey were 4 of the dullest negative defensive teams in the division. They certainly spoiled the game as a spectacle for their fans!

Im just glad Wigan stuck to out scoring teams

do it again this season and prove it was'nt a fluke