www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/no ... -play-offs No surprises that these are staying, but others might have different thoughts.

www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/no ... -play-offs No surprises that these are staying, but others might have different thoughts.

Should be 6. The one sided games this year didn't advertise our sport well.Still don't agree that a team who lost more games than they win can be called champions

Are you referring to Leeds? or just in general? because we won 15 and lost 11

Ah well, looks like we'll have to be champions again next year. Can't teams like Bradford etc cheat on the salary cap again so it gives them a fighting chance ?
Leeds Rhinos.......the only team that's won Superleague without ever breaking the salary cap. A proper club.

No i mean a team who finishes in 8th. Don't have a problem with Leeds winning it. But could you imagine Hull KR been called champions if they found some form.

There wasn't a single team in the top 8 who had lost more games than they had won.

always thought that the clubs would not vote against either of these.

I preferred the 6 team system - having said that I don't particularly mind which position we retain our trophy from.

Wonder who'd be brave or daft enough to pick Leeds in clubcall (if they get the chance)

Rovers won more than they lost as well

I don't have that good an imagination. However, as we finished 7th, perhaps you could make a case for us?

Like it or not the SL competition is split into two parts. The first part (the league) is simply a competition to decide the 8 teams that will play off for the title of SL Champions.

Considered that way the play offs at least make some kind of sense.

In that case, why should people be interested in the former especially when more-than-half quality for them? You have more chance of finishing in the play-offs, then not. Where's the drama in that? Why not just tune in for the last 4 weeks of the season? Especially when there is less weight in significance for finishing first, second, third, etc... (essentially the privileges for finishing first are the same for the rest of the teams within the top 4).

It only makes sense for a play-off system to be exclusive, rather than inclusive. And the top 8 as it stands, ruins both parts - 29 weeks spent waiting to see who will finish in positions 1-4, and 5-8, whilst the majority of those teams KNOW they will qualify for the play-offs weeks in advance, and a play-off system which spreads too thinly, resulting in teams who deserve more of the pie - don't. (oh, and the chance of repeat fixtures from the "qualifying play-offs" to the "qualifying semi-finals" is a joke too)