Oh dear, we are upset aren't we

[uNRL Season Stats (pedestrian, bored rigid, turgid arm wrestle era)[/u
2007: 192 games, 1432 tries, 1217 goals, 37 fg's, 8199 pts, Avg Score 21.35 pts
2008: 192 games, 1460 tries, 1199 goals, 29 fg's, 8267 pts, Avg Score 21.53 pts

[uNRL Season Stats (entertaining, silky skilled, 2 ref era)[/u
2009: 192 games, 1407 tries, 1164 goals, 34 fg's, 7990 pts, Avg Score 20.81 pts
2010: 192 games, 1420 tries, 1205 goals, 38 fg's, 8218 pts, Avg Score 21.17 pts

HTH

In clear contrast to the Wellens one when he was clearly in the field, yet a drop out was given

And the above proves what exactly?

That good players are able to adapt to differing interpretations of the law - points scored doesn't equate to quality as we see every week in the SL. Higher skilled attacked is matched by higher skilled more athletic defense that doesn't have to rely on slowing the PTB down to a snails pace - simply concept even for you Jeff!!

HTH

I thought we looked dangerous with the ball, we did make a lot errors by trying to force the pass a bit too much, but hopefully as the season goes on we'll cut the mistakes out. I would like to think our discipline will improve as the players get used to the new interpretations of some of the rules, and to be fair I think there has been a lot of penalties given in all the games this weekend and I think thats usually the case at this stage of the season. Our defending from kicks was very poor and needs some work, I thought oce we started to put pressure on the Bradford kicker the quality of their kicks deteriorated - we need to do this consistantly.

Overall it was a very patchy performance but we showed a lot of quality at times - Webb, Buderus, BJB and Ali all looked sharp and if we can sort one or two things out we'll go OK this season. Don't forget we've still go Peacock, McGuire, and Huraki to come back.

Which Lautiti try would that be then?

On the first couple of pages of the thread you have already mistakenly referred to Ganson awarding us a penalty rather than a scrum feed following the Briggs knock on.

If you want a sensible discussion a prerequisite would be an ability to properly recognize what actually happened during the game which is clearly beyond you. Why should we give any credence to your opinion as to what constitutes a knock on when you lack the ability to differentiate between try scorers, penalties and scrum feeds?

You're not looking for sensible discussion, you're looking to whine about the result.